The surprise resignation of Jörgen Lindegaard as chief executive of Scandinavia’s SAS offers something of a head scratcher.
The 58-year-old Dane will leave the company this autumn, having presided over five fraught years in the airline’s history. Lindegaard suggested the pressure of running SAS motivated his decision, and a spokesman for the company confirmed it was entirely the chief executive’s choice.
But only 11 days earlier Lindegaard purchased 2,500 SAS shares, worth roughly DKK192,500, to bring his holding in the company to 45,000 shares – which looks like a vote of confidence.
Even so, Lindegaard will be leaving SAS just as his efforts to slash costs and reposition the airline take hold, and while SAS should be riding the broader recovery in the aviation industry. More importantly, though, he leaves with much work yet to be done to overhaul SAS.
A well-regarded executive credited with turning Denmark’s GN Store Nord into a lean high-tech firm from a plodding and unfocused industrial conglomerate, Lindegaard was headhunted in 2001 to join SAS only to run up against the national interests that buffet the carrier. He was the first non-Swede appointed to the role, and many in Sweden weren’t shy in criticising the precedent.
Within six weeks of taking up the post, he then lost his deputy chief executive and the entire board to a price-fixing scandal that predated him. A second deputy resigned less than a year later, which press speculation put down to a personality clash.
All this shuffling in management unfortunately coincided with probably the worst ever downturn for the industry following the 11 September attacks in the US.
From almost day one, Lindegaard has had to implement successively larger cuts, at times pitting him against hostile unions and the interests of the company’s three largest shareholders: Sweden, Denmark and Norway. As recently as January, some pilots staged a wildcat strike in protest at changes in their contracts.
Lindegaard may have kept SAS from going under, but the steps taken haven’t been radical. There are a number of assets, including hotels, that could be sold off.
SAS runs several airlines – under different names and in some cases on competing routes – that could be merged. And more needs to be done to fend off the rising number of no-frills carriers in Europe.